SCOTUS begins hearing arguments on potentially crucial gerrymandering case

For the first time, the Supreme Court seems receptive to putting limits on partisan gerrymanders

Supreme Court Decision on Redistricting Hangs in the Hands of Justice Kennedy

"We are in a situation now where politicians are picking their voters rather than the other way around", he said. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg noted in her opinion that Kennedy had previously called partisan gerrymandering "incompatible with democratic principles".

The secret to advocacy before the contemporary Supreme Court is no secret: it's all about pandering to Justice Anthony Kennedy. Upholding Wisconsin, for example, will benefit Republicans who continue to hold a comfortable majority in the state legislature even though Democratic candidates receive almost half the votes.

The case focused on whether employers can require workers to sign arbitration agreements that curb their ability to bring class-action claims. "Let's assume that it does", Kennedy said. In fact, the court recognized in the 1986 case Davis v. Bandemer, that it had constitutional authority to intervene in cases of partisan redistricting, but refused to do so without some clear metric with which to inform their decision. Lloyd Bentsen (D-Texas) and former Rep. Bill Alexander (D-Ark.), who was chief deputy majority whip of the U.S. House of Representatives. In most states, the legislature controls redistricting. Gorsuch did not ask any more questions for the remainder of the oral arguments.

Both Nariman and Salve said that an increasing number of matters were coming up wherein persons holding high positions in government were making controversial statements on matters pending before courts or being investigated by state agencies.

The lawyer ducked an answer. "Well, it's a little hard to say at this point", said the lawyer, Erin Murphy. "And that's going to come out one case after another as these cases are brought in every state", Roberts said. In 2014, Republicans won 52 percent of the votes but 63 seats. They used that power to draw election maps that strongly favored their party's candidates.

Republicans now represent 13 of 18 congressional districts in Pennsylvania.

After 2012 consecutive victories, Republicans seem to be enjoying an added gain from the extreme process that manipulates votes and alters the election results. "Social-science tools now allow courts to diagnose partisan gerrymanders with accuracy and precision", according to a brief from two political scientists who have helped draw district maps. One of the contorted districts supposedly resembled a salamander - hence the portmanteau of the governor's last name - Gerry - and the word salamander - gerrymander.

In 2008, California voters passed Proposition 11, which created a Citizens Redistricting Commission for state Legislature seats.

The lead plaintiff is Alejandro Rodriguez, a legal immigrant from Mexico who was working as a dental assistant when he was detained for three years without a hearing. It is that Democrats still haven't accepted their loss in the 2016 election.

A lower court ruled in favor of the challengers after conducting a trial in 2016. A federal district court ruled 2-1 a year ago that those districts discriminated against Democratic voters "by impeding their ability to translate their votes into legislative seats". And ever since the mid-1900s, the Supreme Court has ducked the issue of throwing out such insane puzzles, unless the gerrymander was racially motivated.

Kennedy, the longest-serving justice and at age 81 the second oldest, has earned a reputation as the "swing" vote: a conservative willing in some major cases to side with liberal justices.

The Supreme Court opened its new session this week.

"We will have to decide in every case whether the Democrats win or the Republicans win", he said.

Attorneys for the Pennsylvania General Assembly declined to comment but argued to the judge a decision shouldn't be made until the U.S. Supreme court reaches a verdict of a similar case in Wisconsin.

Justice Samuel A. Alito agreed.

If Toobin is to be believed, the justices snipe at each other even when there's a tape delay.

Maryland's 3rd Congressional District has been described as the most egregious case of gerrymandering in the nation. "Isn't that ― what becomes of the precious right to vote?" She continued, "if you can stack a legislature in this way, what incentive is there for a voter to exercise his vote?"

Justice Stephen G. Breyer said he did not need any "gobbledygook" to rule against the Wisconsin plan. In practice, this could mean the legislators wouldn't compromise and the GOP would win an endless series of three to two votes.

Latest News